mido9

What exactly are these  "misdoings" or speak of? Because I have seen plenty of evidence that they did some shitty things.

The Google Doc collected testimonies and evidence from nearly every contributor, while Channel Awesome outright refused to address the majority of them, only cherrypicking certain ones, with responses that made Channel Awesome look even worse.

Sorry, mido, but lately I've been learning that "there is literally no proof" tends to actually mean "There is proof, but it proves my position wrong, so I'm electing to ignore it."

Testimonies aren't very unreliable, especially when it's one person describing something he heard from another person who heard from another person years ago.

It's also very difficult to prove a negative which is why addressing most of the concerns isn't possible, especially when there's supposedly so many of them ranging back years when maybe an incident got misremembered or what was going on behind the scenes wasn't known/shown.