(o ×)

I mean, I've got extensive experience in commander and limited, so those would be what I would be able to write the most informed pieces on. Mostly I'd just want to write something that someone would find interesting.

Here's the thing, though. Commander and limited are already very much written about topics, take any "blog" or content page. So, unless you're writing something that you want to talk about, does it really matter if someone gives you a topic? I can probably find something on any question I have, when it comes to play commander or limited. So, really, I would focus on the topics you want to cover and see how much you are able to write, then try to navigate what people think about it.

This is a huge reason I stopped writing, was because there was not really a draw into the theoretical position in competitive MTG. Even my last article I wrote or my last major project I worked on, many of my readers wanted to hear about the decks I was playing instead of how or what I was trying to build into on the side of competition.

I have found an elegant answer

Agreed

@Kazooie hey there is a 50% chance the next salt mine deck is snow, you gotta pokemon go to the polls.

The only time I actually like it is from inside (where it's warm) looking out the window right after a fresh snowfall. Then the plows come by and it's ruined.

Like, he was neat, and then he introduced himself to threepio after the reboot and I was sold.

The destruction of kijima was actually guy wrenching. Too bad nothing bad in that movie ended up having consequences, huh?

WAIT NO THE MATT PARKMAN REBEL DIED THAT ACTUALLY WAS SAD

why u teasin, bro

but seriously, I'm happy for you for actually having a life, unlike us normies

Bye Joseph.

fine, don't be back

promote me instead i'll give everyone matching funny signatures

please make the logo direct you to the cardmaker instead of the forum

@UltimateIRS sure, but only because you asked.

And now a new name. Yeah. This feels about right.

I like the touch of announcing your intention to confuse. Very sneaky.

It's on-brand.

Yeah the fact it actually functions as a mobile site is hard to get used too huh

Ngl I actually liked the desktop ycm on mobile. This isn't bad, just different

desktop old ycm on mobile was the optimal way to consume the content :c

Don't fall for his trick! You're better than this NCM! This is clickbait in status form!

Nah, I want to see how many people like fries as much as at least TWO characters from Bandori.

do it, pussy

B-b-but, it HAD no logic! Notice how smart I am!

I imagine anyone with goals like his is at least somewhat insane to begin with, and (assuming we're talking about the MCU) it's not like it was really any better in the comics where a large part of his motivation was him wanting to impress Lady Death (which I don't think she was).

There is a reason they hammered home the title of "Mad Titan". He was so consumed by his goal, and the method that was previously his only option, that not once did he consider an alternative, even when granted nigh-omnipotence.

same

sick and tired of being sick and tired

Yes

no too late we already decided spectrum was the only ncm theme sorry

How dare you

The legendary Co-Fuck?! My God...

charles manson for president

you can't know if you're smart because i haven't told you that you are yet.

Your fault for disrespecting GLORIOUS LEADER.

7 WP for telling the truth

Turns out I was ahead of the curve this whole time

I was smart enough to get the mask DLC before the main player base realized it was essential for an optimal playthrough.

Best first minute I've heard in a rap song tbh

‎

no

i do enough of that to myself already

I'll be nice

idk

Allow me to be more clear. When using BBCode syntax ([§poiler]content[/§poiler]) in cases where a spoiler is nested more than once, the forum has an inexplicable habit of rearranging content, and even making a good deal of it disappear. I am aware that the in-forum spoiler button has no such issues, but I would prefer to use manual code, as most of my content is made in outside documents and pasted in immediately before posting. Because of this process, individually using the embedded spoiler button and pasting a document in several if not dozens of pieces would be quite a time sink and leave quite a bit of room for error, akin to having to manually go back and bold or italicize any text you wanted to be such, hoping you forget nothing.

I understand that most everyone else does not use code manually, but given it is a function that the forum is supposed to have, I don't think it is unreasonable to be upset about. The presence of stairs don't write away a broken elevator.

which thread

TRUE

No one:

Wizards after introducing a long-awaited mechanic return as a smaller theme in a set: Hey you know what this needs? A hoser.

Realtalk, I think it is important to introduce a tangible reason to not run snow lands. There were cards before, like Freyalise's Radiance, but they weren't good because they only worked against snow. Reihane is a card I would use in appropriate decks even without the line about snow, so she gives snow basics an inherent downside to balance out all their inherent upsides.

Without her, many players would feel obligated to run snow basics rather normal basics, so as to cash in on these marginal upsides. Now these marginal upsides come with a marginal downside. This make using normal basics a deck building decision, rather than a deck building concession.

This further rewards and provides justification for people who particularly like using basics they have collected over the years. Because this card exists, I feel much more confident in my decision to use amonkhet islands in my Unesh deck, because the risk of reihane is greater than the benefit of scrying sheets, whereas my Gitrog deck uses snow-covered forests (and a snow-covered swamp) because it makes Into the North into a better rampant growth, that can also search for my dark depths.

Thanks for coming to my ted talk.

Yeah, how long were those Christmas lights up again?

Only fuckin nerds use ortem and this is how we filter them out

Sounds to me like you're not competitive enough; This is giving-up energy.

dangerous words.

lol

Shut the fuck up dae this is 100% your kind of deck.

if u pay me the $13 a year cost yeah

Fucking communist

Well, if you're offering...

No